Monday, May 21st

Last update06:00:00 AM GMT

You are here: Work Why your internal and external communications should be HR-led (I)
Banner
Banner
Banner

Why your internal and external communications should be HR-led (I)

E-mail Print PDF

Many employees at a major textile company first learned of the organization’s portfolio review plans not from internal corporate sources--such as HR, a corporate announcement or their individual managers--but from a radio news broadcast or news leak they heard while driving to work.

When a consulting firm implemented a peer evaluation process for employees, the first time many heard about it was when co-workers started making casual comments, instant messaging and tweeting about having received “a survey.” HR expected Managers to tell their employees; managers thought HR would “take care of it.”

Do such communication “glitches” have a negative impact on employee trust, commitment, loyalty and the perception of how the firm is being led? Most communications and HR professionals would say yes.

It is said that whatever is said in secret shall be exposed on the housetop, someday, somehow. We should expect this even more with the swathe of communications tools and social media options available to employees and organisations. Organisations more and more are finding it challenging to manage the flow, pace and media, of what is shared internally versus what is shared externally. When the synchronisation of internal and external messaging is well managed, organisations at least will maintain an even keel with employees, stakeholders and investors; and when badly managed, it could easily create industrial relations problems or a stakeholder crisis respectively. In a few cases, you could have a crisis with both internal and external stakeholders at same time.

Your people are your most valuable assets (and I dare add that how you connect and engage with them extends or diminishes the value you get out of them!). Furthermore, your people are your most accessible and low cost ambassadors, reaching nooks and crannies that normal external communication channels may never reach, with a passion and credibility that can be only ascribed to people. Your employees will also provide timely and often unbiased feedback, if you care to listen to them!

Internal communication is about employee engagement, fostering internal stakeholder engagement and feedback, and providing information and avenues for dialogue that energises and enables staff to work effectively towards achieving the strategic business goals. Internal communication is also the art and act of managing the internal constituency of stakeholders including senior leadership on what to say, how to say, whom to, where and when to say.

This is all firmly in the HR domain and is also strongly aligned with external communication.

The case for HR-led internal communications is pretty clear and it is, about the HR function creating an environment where employees are engaged, where they offer and exchange ideas that increase employee and ultimately, customer satisfaction. It is also about creating a work environment that improves individual and organisational performance, enabling staff across all levels to experience a greater level of job satisfaction.

The real challenge is who develops message and who manages messaging or dissemination of the message? Should it be HR for the internal or the external affairs department for the external? For sure, since it is one message, though with a different slant, it should developed by one function, and that should HR in my view.

Communication of information to either internal or external parties should be consistent with the corporate values; it’s position on profits, strategy, crisis management branding and the value proposition to employees, customers and stakeholders – after all there should be no difference between internal and external values, for that matter! HR is the value custodian!

Comments 

 
#4 Rachel 2012-02-01 15:27
I think it depends on how big the company is and how broad the communications have to be [multiple sites, international, or small.] For a company that is in transition, I think this also calls for unique communication needs. HR can represent the "heart" and personable touch, or it could be absolutely out of the main corporate loop. I think a close coordination between groups is necessary, and am biased towards the HR lead for employee comms & lots of inclusion from senior mgmt.
Quote
 
 
#3 Sean Williams 2012-02-01 12:21
And, truly, you cannot believe that HR should lead external communications! Once again, no functional element of HR comes close to the skills required to effectively manage reputation, gain publicity, manage issues and create stakeholder value. Even the most strategic HR counsel couldn't agree with you!
Quote
 
 
#2 Sean Williams 2012-02-01 12:18
I'm with the ever learned Mr. Trainor here. HR led? HR is an internal client of the communications function and benefits greatly in enlightened organizations from our expertise. The skill-sets between comms and HR are different, and the idea that HR is suited to lead the function is debatable. Organizational leadership is the true "custodian" of values -- they model the behavior and hold each other accountable for values congruence.

Thanks to @jgombita for pointing me here!

Sean
@CommAMMO
Quote
 
 
#1 Sean Trainor 2012-01-31 18:45
Two assertions are made which I completely disagree with
"HR are values custodians"
"The case for HR led internal communications is clear"
On that basis alone this argument is flawed.
Quote
 

Add comment