Newsletter
Email:
Poll: Ministry of Niger Delta
Do you support the recently-established ministry of Niger Delta?
Home | Energy | FG foresees gradual rise in electricity tariff over 3 yrs

FG foresees gradual rise in electricity tariff over 3 yrs

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
The Federal Government had earlier indicated its intention to subsidise electricity tariff for the next three years, but Business Day has gathered that after this year, government subsidy will subsequently decline as power supply improves. In effect, the tariff will increase yearly forthe next three years to bring the tariff to the envisaged N11 per kilowatt unit. The calculation is that by next year, electricity tariff will rise to N7 on the back of improved services.

"The multi-year tariff order would have as its cost base N11 per kilowatt unit of electricity, thereafter it would be graduated according to specified margin to be determined by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission," says a source.

The source added that no consumer of electricity would pay the new bill "for now until possibly after three years during which enough enlightenment sensitisation would have been made."

The current tariff of N6 per kilowatt unit of electricity paid to the distribution companies would be augmented by the Federal Government through a subsidy of about N177 billion, which is expected to be part of the supplementary budget that is expected to be presented to the National Assembly. However, about N64 billion of the amount would be made available this year.

MYTO is a planning tool to provide a framework and the rules to apply in determining and regulating future tariffs to be charged by independent power producers (IPPs) over a period of time. It also allows stakeholders to envisage the outcome of various actions or events in the sector.

The tariff will progressively reflect the cost of supply of electricity at an adequate and improving level of efficiency.

As part of the reform initiatives of government for the power sector and the need to facilitate the involvement of the private sector in building necessary infrastructure, the tariff framework was approved and adopted by the Federal Government for tariff determination and a Multi-Year Tariff Order.

The Federal Government will bear the cost over the three-year period of the subsidy. The price of power will increase as generation improves. That is, should the cost of power per kilowatt increase to N8 in 2009, the Federal Government will pay for the extra N2 on the increase from the subsisting N6 per kilowatt.

Discussions on the MYTO were finalised in March this year after all stakeholders within the industry and outside the industry had deliberated on the issue of tariff.

There are different methods for regulation of electricity pricing (tariff) in a regulatory regime. The methods normally used are rate of return regulation (RoR), performance- or incentive-based regulation (PBR).

An industry source says the RoR, also known as cost of service regulation, is based on cost plus regulation.

He says the purpose of regulation is to ensure that the utility or licensee recovers all costs that are prudently incurred including a fair rate of return on prudent investment.

The expenses include fuel costs, purchase of power cost, operation and maintenance expenses including employees’ cost, administration and general expenses, depreciation expenses, interest on loans and taxes.

Comments (3 posted):

Sam Pam on 14 May, 2008 12:07:58
avatar
Two things amaze me, on the one side I can't imagine how brilliant government officials are not smart enough to notice that price-control mostly leads to scarcity with no concrete example of success all round the world, on the other side government's constant rhetoric about bringing in private sectors when infact they're doing the exact opposite. I think it's been long over due government packed it's luggages off our markets and liberate and protect our property rights.
Oye Akintoye on 15 May, 2008 09:25:41
avatar
Though i'm against price control, i'll be forced to admit that the power sector by its nature is difficult to liberalise the way we would want. This is because one cannot switch from one provider to the other like gsm and other service (or would we draw spearate power lines to our houses)?

In this case, govt should at least fully withdraw after the 3 years.But the multi year tarrif is used in many parts of the world and makes a lot of sense. I don't call that price control if its mutually agreed on with regulator, operator and consumer.
Sam Pam on 16 May, 2008 09:49:50
avatar
I disagree with you Oye, multi-tariff fixing is definately price control even if it doesn't appear so at first sight. Any law or contract that fixes a maximum(case of the said tarrifs) or minimum(case of wages/salaries) price is a form of price control no matter how disguised it were.
For your observation that customers don't make changes in the short run, you're right, but they do in the long run! And any electricity company that decides to sacrifice its clientèle for a short-run gain will be doing that at its own peril because with time, it's consumers will make appropriate changes. It's usually not as flexible as,say, mobile services but it still obeys the basic tenets of competition if allowed to by our government.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
1.25