Much ado during a serious economic recession about a uniform

by | March 21, 2017 12:28 am

For several weeks now the Senate and the Comptroller General of Custom has been embroiled in an argument about the proper mode of dressing the Comptroller should wear to appear before the House. The Senate wants to discuss the Comptroller’s directive that custom duties be paid when due.

But the question is whether the whole fuss is worth it – if the Comptroller General of custom should appear before the Senate in uniform. Col Ali obviously thinks that the uniform is infra dig to him, even if paradoxically he does not think the office is below him! A simple person’s view would be quite straight forward; if you do not want to wear the uniform, resign and go home.

It is generally believed that Col Ali is very close to President Buhari. If that is so, then he is not serving the President who has still not fully recovered well by his obstinacy. This issue has taken the Speaker and the President of the Senate to Aso Rock to discuss the problem. The general view of General Buhari is that he is a disciplinarian. Mr. Ali’s behaviour puts such views seriously in doubt. One would have expected he would have fired Mr. Ali long before now even if Mr. Ali was his only child. I use the word child advisedly because all parties in this imbroglio have behaved most childishly.

There are other implications of this standoff. General Hannaniya was happy to wear the uniform of the Traffic Corp. So was Nobel Laurette, Wole Soyinka. But all this space devoted to Ali’s uniform or lack thereof is a bit unnecessary. The main issue of how to solve the problem of payment of custom dues to stakeholders still remains to be solved.

There is however, another side to the story. The Senate and House of Representatives have not been icons of respectability themselves. Both Houses have manipulated the number of oversight committees so as to give a post of Chairman or Deputy to its members and therefore qualify for being public servants and as such, entitled to other emoluments. Nigeria is in serious recession: oil prices have fallen, production levels are lower, earnings even lower. The National Assembly has no plans to reduce their still undisclosed salaries, nor plans to reduce spending within the National Assembly or the judiciary. If recurrent expenditure eats over 84% of our revenue, one would expect that one of the first jobs in an austerity driven budget would be to reduce the recurrent administrative costs. Rather the last scandal from the National Assembly is that of padding the budget with items that interest members of the National Assembly.

I have been impressed by the relentless pursuit of the National Assembly in the discharge of the oversight functions in chasing down moneys which seem to have disappeared into thin air from the executive. I am not going to speculate into the widespread view that the diligence of the National Assembly in these matters is not altogether altruistic.

Nevertheless to have a body that is able to hold somebody to an account must be ultimately good for democracy. Lately the National Assembly hero moved the Minister of Finance as the Chairman of the National Procurement Commission on the sound principle that sometimes the ministry of Finance also procure items: Ipso facto, the National Assemble does procure things, who presides when this happens?

Finally, on the Comptroller General and his Uniform, I believe that the Comptroller is under the general supervision of the Minister of Finance who would have been the proper person to address the problem raised by the National Assembly. I know that various sections of the law were read out to show that the Comptroller was mentioned by name. Even so, a lot of hot air would have been saved if the minister was called upon to answer questions which deal with the raising of revenue. I would hate to speculate on why the national assembly is this, as in other similar cases would like to go to the offices in charge rather than to the minister of the parastatal.

But that is only one side of the story. Why should the National Assembly be that concerned at the uniform of an official of Government? How is the prestige of the National Assembly members trammelled by the arrogance of an officer who obviously has not good home training? The Surgeon General of the United States would never dream of appearing before a congressional committee in anything less than his best, which in this case would be his uniform. Respect is earned, never demanded. If you allow yourself to be manoeuvred into demanding respect, you probably do not deserve it.


Patrick Dele-Cole